Why Treasurers Want a Stand-Alone Bank Relationship Management (BRM) Solution
- Nisha Bist
- Sep 15
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 23
Treasurers today operate in one of the most complex financial ecosystems ever. While Treasury Management Systems (TMS) provide strong capabilities for cash, liquidity, and risk management, they fall short when it comes to governing and optimizing banking relationships.
Corporates increasingly recognize that Bank Relationship Management (BRM) requires more than a “module” within a TMS. They need dedicated solutions that deliver:
Centralized governance across entities, accounts, and signatories
Regulatory & compliance visibility for mandates and KYC requirements
Fee transparency & optimization to reduce costs and strengthen negotiation power
Enterprise-wide access spanning Treasury, Legal, Compliance, Procurement, and Audit
The Current Landscape

M360 Unified BRM Suite Overview

Why Treasurers Need Stand-Alone BRM
Scope Misalignment
| Rising Complexity of Banking Ecosystems
|
Compliance Pressures
| Fee Transparency and Optimization
|
Cross-Functional Relevance
| Technology Independence
|
Strategic Value of Stand-Alone BRM
Governance & Risk MitigationNo hidden accounts or unauthorized mandates. | Negotiation PowerOptimize fees, strengthen wallet share leverage. |
Operational EfficiencyStandardized onboarding and mandated workflows. | Future-ProofingAdaptable to M&A, regulatory change, global scaling. |

Market Implications
Shift to modular stacks
Treasurers prefer best-of-breed over monolithic TMS.
BRM as a category
Just as procurement tech split from ERP.
Vendor opportunity
Independent, workflow-centric BRM platforms are well positioned.
Treasurers no longer see BRM as a “nice-to-have” inside a TMS. They need governance, transparency, and relationship intelligence that only a stand-alone BRM delivers.
As global complexity rises, BRM will become as essential as TMS—not as a secondary module, but as a core pillar of the treasury technology stack.



Comments